actuellecd

John Cage: Four

Bozzini Quartet / John Cage

Trois approches, trois défis, parfaitement assumés. Revue & Corrigée, France

Here the Bozzinis demonstrate their impressive range, playing together, apart and indifferently. La Folia, ÉU

Une nouvelle vision de l’œuvre complète pour quatuor à cordes de John Cage. Survolant quarante ans de l’activité de l’artiste, ces trois chefs-d’œuvre éclairent les différentes périodes stylistiques de ce grand du 20e siècle.

  • SODEC

CD (CQB 1414)

  • Étiquette: Collection QB
  • CQB 1414
  • 2014
  • UCC 771028371426
  • Durée totale: 79:25
  • 125 mm × 125 mm × 6 mm
  • 40 g

Sur le web

Téléchargement (CQB 1414_NUM)

Cet article peut être téléchargé et/ou écouté sur le site collectionqb.bandcamp.com.

Hors-catalogue

Cet article n’est pas disponible via notre site web. Nous l’avons catalogué à titre informatif seulement.

  • Étiquette: Collection QB
  • CQB 1414_NUM
  • 2014
  • UCC 771028371488
  • Durée totale: 79:25
Notes de programme

À propos des ces quatuors

La composition des trois quatuors à cordes s’est effectuée durant la seconde moitié de la vie de John Cage. Il écrit String Quartet in Four Parts (1949-50), alors qu’il commence à rejeter l’image du compositeur créateur d’une œuvre d’art comme véhicule de l’expression personnelle, pour se tourner vers celle, radicalement différente, du compositeur-organisateur de structures temporelles au travers desquelles les sons se manifestent sans qu’aucune intention personnelle, émotionnelle, théâtrale ou narrative ne soit perceptible.

Le String Quartet in Four Parts évoque les quatre saisons: elles n’y sont pas présentées comme une expression personnelle de l’artiste, mais plutôt comme des caractéristiques impressionnistes du son et du mouvement. La pièce est écrite de façon traditionnelle. «Les saisons en sont le sujet, dit Cage, mais les deux premiers mouvements font référence à des lieux… l’été en France, l’automne aux États-Unis. Les troisième et quatrième mouvements décrivent également des sujets musicaux: l’hiver s’expose sous forme de canon, le printemps comme un quodlibet». Cage décrit cette œuvre comme une ligne mélodique sans accompagnement. Chaque instrument possède une gamme spécifique de sons dont la structure ressemble un peu à celle d’une construction de blocs composant la ligne mélodique et soutenant la cohésion harmonique de l’ensemble. Chaque mouvement a aussi sa propre structure rythmique; c’est ainsi que le son se déroule à l’intérieur d’une organisation temporelle proportionnelle et mesurée préétablie par le compositeur.

À la fin des années 70, il commence à écrire une musique dont la notation — d’apparence parfois traditionnelle et parfois spatiotemporelle — s’inscrit à l’intérieur de parenthèses temporelles flexibles (time brackets). Ces parenthèses indiquent aux musiciens la durée d’une musique donnée mais leur permettent de choisir le moment et sa vitesse lors d’une performance. «C’est comme un processus qui intègre les structures, qui peut avoir n’importe quelle longueur et qui peut commencer ou se terminer n’importe quand à l’intérieur des parenthèses», explique le compositeur. «J’aime la souplesse… notre relation (à l’égard des musiciens et entre eux) est apolitique et anarchiste».

C’est de cette façon qu’est composé Thirty Pieces for String Quartet (1983). Chaque partie est indépendante des autres, chacune dans sa propre parenthèse temporelle qui dure approximativement une minute. Selon le compositeur, «Il s’agit d’une “coïncidence” de solos. Chaque solo est soit microtonal (un rythme “pulsé” de sons et d’harmoniques), tonal (des lignes plus lentes et soutenues) ou chromatique (complexe, dynamique, presque virtuose). Une sorte de kaléidoscope mobile de textures et d’activités se déploie alors dans un espace-temps de trente minutes. «Par cette flexibilité structurelle, la musique devient en quelque sorte à l’épreuve des tremblements de terre», souligne John Cage.

Four (1989) appartient à la série des «Number Pieces», commencée en 1987 et inachevée à sa mort, et dont le titre des œuvres révèle le nombre de musiciens requis pour son exécution. Les parenthèses temporelles sont toujours indiquées, mais le matériel sonore des dernières années est considérablement simplifié; parfois, il n’y a qu’un seul son, quelquefois deux ou trois et, dans cette œuvre, ils sont toujours joués très doucement. Four diffère de Thirty Pieces for String Quartet, car les musiciens ont accès à toutes les parties; pas de virtuosité individuelle, mais un ensemble de densités tonales changeantes. En parlant de ses «Number Pieces», Cage a déclaré qu’une «performance musicale peut être une métaphore pour décrire la société… pas de chef… pas de partition». C’est comme si, au crépuscule de sa vie, il avait choisi de clarifier et de simplifier sa musique, qui serait à l’image d’une «société judicieusement organisée» (jeu de mots intraduisible: «A society soundly organized»).

Malcolm Goldstein [traduction française: Sylvie Brousseau, i-14]

Quelques articles recommandés
La presse en parle

Review

Grant Chu Covell, La Folia, 1 novembre 2015

As a collection, Cage’s string quartets permit an ensemble to explore different ways of collaborating. The String Quartet in Four Parts was written just before Cage’s plunge into chance. It’s traditionally notated and organized akin to the micro and macro structures Cage explored in his early percussion music. The Bozzini pivots expertly between delicate antique and dissonant chords. Thirty Pieces and Four are from the same decade, however are separated by a divide. Thirty Pieces consist of essentially 120 one-minute solos delivered four at a time. Each player prepares independently and in performance they coordinate as little as possible and spread themselves at far distances around the audience. It’s an accidental quartet; modern, aggressive, and lightly sprinkled with extended techniques and microtones. Four operates at a low threshold with neutral singularities. Chords and coincidences are expected but details are unpremeditated. Tones appear, unornamented, nearly expressionless and ugly. There’s a passage starting around 22:13 hinting at Mozart’s Dissonant. Here the Bozzinis demonstrate their impressive range, playing together, apart and indifferently.

Here the Bozzinis demonstrate their impressive range, playing together, apart and indifferently.

Review

Dominy Clements, MusicWeb International, 30 septembre 2015

While new recordings of music by John Cage are always likely to find a rather niche market they are always welcome as far as I’m concerned. This is partly since performances of many of his works have to be unique events by the very nature of the ways they have been conceived and composed, and so the potential for surprise is always present.

The three works for string quartet come from intriguing moments in the last half of Cage’s development as a composer, and it is nice to have them all together on one disc. The Bozzini Quartet has been a quality purveyor of contemporary music for string quartet since 1999, and their other titles, including Sens(e) Absence, are all worth seeking out. This recording can easily be had as a download, the CD otherwise arriving in a colourful but environment-friendly cardboard foldout envelope with texts in French and English.

As ever, the information from Cage’s own site sums up the content of each work very neatly. String Quartet in Four Parts “… consists of four movements: Quietly flowing along - Slowly rocking - Nearly stationary – Quodlibet … It is a work of great simplicity, reminiscent of Érik Satie and in a way a further step toward Cage’s abandonment of self-expression. As in his Sonatas and Interludes, it deals with the nine permanent emotions of Indian philosophy (see Sonatas and Interludes), as well as the Indian notion of the seasons, i.e. creation, preservation, destruction, and quiescence. In the first movement, the subject is Summer in France, in the second it is Fall in America. The third movement is about Winter, and the fourth, about Spring, is a welcome and quite sprightly quodlibet.” This is enigmatic but relatively approachable music with a feel of melodic shape and tonal resolution, even where there are dissonant clusters. Everything is pared-down. There are no wasted notes, and not as much stretching of time as will be found as a feature of the later works. It’s hard not to experience the first three movements as emotionally barren, but with their open intervals you can easily place them as in a line from something medieval. In these times of austerity the bare-bones approach is as relevant as it has ever been. The final Quodlibet is like an ancient and formal dance, Cage playfully concluding his piece with his sparing notes compacted into something with a smile.

The Cage website entry for Thirty Pieces for String Quartet is also revealing: “This work comprises four parts without overall score. Each player rehearses alone. During performance, they sit far apart at points surrounding the audience. This work takes its title from Cage’s Thirty Pieces for Five Orchestras. Cage says of this work: ‘Just as that work is a coincidence of chamber orchestras, this is a coincidence of solos.’” These solos have tonal, chromatic, and microtonal typed of music, and this is an early example of Cage’s technique of organising each piece into a time brackets. The result is a more extreme ‘squeaky-gate’ kind of music – the sort of thing which has most people running for the hills, and certainly the sort of work which delivers a different kind of value in live performance than with recordings. The Bozzini Quartet players enter this musical game with gusto however, making as convincing an argument as I’ve heard for this as a set of chance elements. These come together to catch us in their radically expressive and philosophical nets. Do we accept Cage’s world of pure-sound, or are we being hoodwinked by spectacular intellectual fakery? As Frank Zappa said, “without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible”, which gets us into that whole debate about the perceived reality of ‘progress’ as opposed to ‘change’. It’s all very interesting and stimulating, but the Thirty Pieces remain a tough nut to crack.

Four is an example of Cage’s Number Pieces, the number being determined by the number of performers; bringing us firmly into his late period. Cage’s instructions for the work are that, “the players sit in the conventional relation to each other”, followed by details about proportion with regard to repetitions and options for duration, including exchanges of parts between players. A live performance will always involve a certain amount of kerfuffle with this kind of moving around of pieces of paper, and I always wonder if Cage intended this to be part of the soundscape. The Bozzini Quartet is respectfully soundless in this regard, and their performance shows where the arc of enigmatic severity of writing landed from the earlier period to the late works, with admirably controlled sustained notes creating a wonderful sense of stillness.

John Cage’s string quartets are not unknown on recordings, and as you would expect, the Arditti Quartet — dedicatee of String Quartet in Four Parts was in there first with their complete edition in on the Mode label in the early 1990s. In general the Arditti version has a more introverted feel to it, making the Bozzini version of, for instance, the Quodlibet from String Quartet in Four Parts sound positively effusive, though this is also a side-effect of wider dynamic range and a more detailed and etched recorded sound. With a piece like Four the atmosphere is all-important, and the Arditti Quartet does a good job of making time stand almost still, the musical landscape emerging and receding with gradually evolving nuances. The more closely recorded Bozzini Quartet is also very good, exploring breathy and woody sonorities in their instruments, and the overall result being a little more edge-of-the-seat rather than basking in enigmatic beauty, but none the worse for that.

The Bozzini Quartet has been a quality purveyor of contemporary music for string quartet since 1999…

Review

Stuart Broomer, The WholeNote, 28 septembre 2015

Montreal’s Quatuor Bozzini has been together for 16 years and has recorded 15 CDs of the kind of challenging contemporary music that they specialize in, including works by Canadians Malcolm Goldstein, Tim Brady and Jean Derome and international figures like Steve Reich and James Tenney. The experience tells as they take on John Cage’s three works for string quartet, realizing distinctive versions in the process.

The earliest of the compositions, String Quartet in Four Parts (1949-50), is a work descriptive of the four seasons with the composer’s notes encouraging light string contact and no vibrato. The work’s structure and minimal harmonies create an unlikely resemblance to the melodic purity of medieval music. Leaping ahead to 1983, Thirty Pieces for String Quartet presents the musicians with both demands and choices: each piece lasts about a minute, with each musician given a sequence of notes to be fitted into the “time bracket.” The musicians individually choose between microtonal, tonal and chromatic options, but the parts are not directly related to one another except for the coordination of segment lengths. The music that emerges within these configurations is rich in complexity and convergence, a kind of collaboration between composer, performer and listener.

The final work, Four, from 1989, is the most radically reductive of these works, still employing time brackets but offering choices from its sparse materials to all the performers. The result is spacious but continuous with tonal structures that may gently evolve or appear transient. The cumulative work is a serene landscape in which mysterious elements emerge and disappear.

Quatuor Bozzini assumes the substantial demand that this music makes on its performers: to at once realize the work in shaping its form while allowing the components to maintain their distinct, non-structural identities. If the Arditti Quartet’s recordings of these works (on Muse from the early 1990s) have long stood as masterful readings (they worked closely with Cage on Four), Quatuor Bozzini does a fine job of traversing this music, inevitably creating new works in the process.

Quatuor Bozzini does a fine job of traversing this music, inevitably creating new works in the process.

Recenzje

Łukasz Komła, Nowamuzyka, 27 mars 2015

Niezwykle ceniony kanadyjski kwartet smyczkowy Quatuor Bozzini: Clemens Merkel (skrzypce), Alissa Cheung (skrzypce), Stéphanie Bozzini (altówka), Isabelle Bozzini (wiolonczela), sięga po trzy różne nagrania Johna Cage’a. Pierwsza kompozycja to String Quartet in Four Parts (1949-50). W tamtym okresie Cage odchodził od typowej funkcji kompozytora i jednocześnie wcielał się w postać, która pozwoli mu przedstawić swoją twórczość bez większych emocjonalnych i narracyjnych intencji. Kilka dekad później stworzył Thirty Pieces for String Quartet (1983), z kolei w tym utworze Cage położył spory nacisk na określone sekwencje działań w określonych ramach czasowych. Zaś w 1989 roku Amerykanin napisał Four — prace nad tym dziełem rozpoczął już w 1987 roku i prowadził aż do śmierci w 1992 roku. Znakomite interpretacje tych kompozycji znajdziecie na albumie John Cage: Four. Materiał zarejestrowano w kwietniu 2014 roku podczas koncertów w Montrealu.

Critique

Marie-Pierre Brasset, PAN M 360, 1 janvier 2015

Le Quatuor Bozzini est un trésor national qui rayonne sur la scène internationale depuis plusieurs années déjà et compte plus d’une dizaine d’albums de qualité à son actif. Il livre ici un enregistrement d’anthologie à garder précieusement dans sa discothèque: trois chefs-d’œuvre de Cage pour quatuor à cordes couvrant quarante années de la carrière du compositeur. D’une limpidité parfois déconcertante, la musique de Cage, loin de tout épanchement romantique, est admirablement servie par le style clair et cristallin du quatuor. Nécessaire et intemporel.

Le Quatuor Bozzini est un trésor national…
Blogue